Species Tamoya gargantua Haeckel, 1880
Compiler and date details
June 2012 - Lisa-ann Gershwin
DRAFT RECORD
This taxon is under review. This record is released now for public view, prior to final verification. For further information or comment email us.
Distribution
Ecological Descriptors
Marine, pelagic.
Notes
Reported in Australia by: Marsh & Slack Smith 1986; Williamson et al. 1996.
Nomenclature:
The species was reported in Australian waters as T. gargantua, but is more accurately known as T. haeckeli Southcott, 1967.
The nomenclature of this species was partially corrected by Southcott (1967), based on the discussions of Bigelow (1938) and Kramp (1956b, 1961b). To summarize, Lesson (1829) applied the name Beroe gargantua to a form from New Guinea; later this was transferred to the genus Epomis (Lesson, 1836; 1843). Whatever name Lesson's form is known by, it is still unrecognizable due to the inadequate description and confusing figure.
Haeckel was the first to provide a description adequate for recognition to the species that Lesson had used earlier, as Tamoya gargantua from Samoa. However, it is not clear whether Lesson's and Haeckel's specimens actually belonged to the same species.
Mayer (1910) dismissed T. gargantua in a single sentence, regarding it is too imperfectly known to be retained.
Bigelow (1938) was the first to attempt to straighten out the confusion, concluding that the name T. gargantua sensu Haeckel should be retained in the interest of stability. Kramp (1956b) agreed with Bigelow that all Indo-Pacific specimens of Tamoya belong to the same species, which he considered to be T. gargantua Haeckel non Lesson, but later (1961b) considered T. gargantua Haeckel to be possibly identical to the Atlantic T. haplonema.
Finally, Southcott (1967) proposed a new name, T. haeckeli, to replace T. gargantua Haeckel non Lesson, based on the fact that the specific name gargantua was applied by Haeckel in error. However, the above changes apply to the name only, so the form to which it applies, and thus its relationships to other species, remains unclear.
Misidentifications
Tamoya gargantua is occasionally reported from northwest shelf waters of Western Australia. However, these reports actually refer to an undescribed species of Alatina. Tamoya gargantua has not been credibly demonstrated to occur in Australian waters.
General References
Mayer, A.G. 1910. Medusae of the World. Vol. 1 and 2, The Hydromedusae. Vol. 3, The Scyphomedusae. Washington, D.C. : Carnegie Institution 735 pp., 76 pls. [reprinted by A. Asher & Co., 1977]
History of changes
Published | As part of group | Action Date | Action Type | Compiler(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
05-Aug-2022 | MEDUSOZOA Petersen, 1979 | 16-Mar-2015 | MODIFIED | Dr Lisa Gershwin |
13-Aug-2013 | MODIFIED |