Vascular Plants Australian Plant Census (APC)

Showing Poa poiformis
Poa poiformis (Labill.) Druce legitimate | sensu Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria (2014), Australian Plant Census
Poa caespitosa G.Forst. ex Spreng. auct. non G.Forst. ex Spreng.: Mueller, F.J.H. von (1873), Fragmenta Phytographiae Australiae 8(64): 133 Poa caespitosa G.Forst. ex Spreng. auct. non G.Forst. ex Spreng.: Hemsley, W.B. (1896), The Flora of Lord Howe Island. Annals of Botany 10(2): 259 Poa caespitosa G.Forst. ex Spreng. auct. non G.Forst. ex Spreng.: Garnock-Jones, P.J. (1986), South Pacific plants named by K.P.J.Sprengel in 1807. Taxon 35: 126 Poa caespitosa var. labillardierei (Steud.) J.M.Black auct. non (Steud.) J.M.Black: Black, J.M. (1922), Cyatheaceae - Orchidaceae. Flora of South Australia 1: 80 Poa labillardierei Steud. auct. non Steud.: Bentham, G. (March 1878), Flora Australiensis 7: 651 Poa labillardierei Steud. auct. non Steud.: Rodway, L. (1903), The Tasmanian Flora: 270-271
  • The name Poa australis R.Br. is based on Arundo poiformis Labill., however, Brown's description and the specimen cited represent Poa sieberiana Spreng. The name Poa australis R.Br. var. australis is listed by A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2330 (1991), but this autonym does not exist, in accordance with ICBN Art. 27.2 (Vienna Code) (2006). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index (1991) also stated that Poiret did not validly make the combinations Arundo laevis and A. plebia (both p. 206). However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, these names are considered to be validly published.
  • WA, SA, NSW, LHI, Vic, Tas