Comment:nom. inval., as no Latin description or diagnosis or reference to a previously and effectively published Latin description or diagnosis is provided as required by ICN Art. 39.1 (Melbourne Code, 2012). van Ooststroom refers to “HALL. F. in ENGL., Bot. Jahrb. XLIX (1913) p. 379”, but the name appears in that work as a nom. inval., nom. nud.