Schott, H.W. (7 February 1818), Auszüge aus den Berichten und Briefe der auf befehl Sr. Majestät des Kaisers nach Brasilien abgeschickten österreichisschen Naturforscher an den Direktor des k.k. Hof-Naturkabinette Herrn Karl von Schreibers als Referenten des wissenschaftlichen Anteiles der Expedition. Erneuerte Vaterländische Blätter für den Oesterreichischen Kaiserstaat 1818: 42 [tax. nov.]

• Type: "Hab. in montosis Gibraltariae."

Schott, H.W. in Oken, L. (ed.) (1818), Botanische Berichte für Europa. Isis oder Encyclopaedische Zeitung 1818(5): 821 [secondary reference]

Eichler, Hj. (1965), Supplement to J.M.Black's Flora of South Australia (Second Edition, 1943-1957): 167 [secondary reference]

Amor, R.L. & Miles, B.A. (5 July 1975), Taxonomy and distribution of Rubus fruticosus L. Agg. (Rosaceae) naturalized in Victoria. Muelleria 3(1): 49-54 [secondary reference]

Jacobs, S.W.L. & Pickard, J. (1981), Plants of New South Wales: 187 [secondary reference]

Green, J.W. (1985), Census of the Vascular Plants of Western Australia Edn. 2: 83 [secondary reference]

pro parte misapplication: Rubus fruticosus L. legitimate by Gardner, C.A. (June 1930), Part II. Proteaceae–Papilionaceae. Enumeratio Plantarum Australiae Occidentalis: 48 pro parte misapplication: Rubus fruticosus L. legitimate by Green, J.W. (1981), Census of the Vascular Plants of Western Australia: 44

Bennett, E.M. in Marchant, N.G., Wheeler, J.R., Rye, B.L., Bennett, E.M., Lander, N.S. & Macfarlane, T.D. (1987), Rosaceae. Flora of the Perth Region 1: 210-211 [secondary reference]

common name: Blackberry [n/a]

Harden, G.J. & Rodd, A.N. in Harden, G.J. (ed.) (1990), Rosaceae. Flora of New South Wales 1: 535 [secondary reference]

common name: Blackberry [n/a]

Symon, D.E. in Jessop, J.P. (ed.) (September 1993), Rosaceae. A list of the vascular plants of South Australia Edn. 4: 36 [secondary reference]

Jeanes, J.A. & Jobson, P.C. in Walsh, N.G. & Entwisle, T.J. (ed.) (1996), Rosaceae. Flora of Victoria 3: 574-575, Fig. 117n [secondary reference]

common name: Blackberry [n/a]

Harden, G.J. & Rodd, A.N. in Harden, G.J. (ed.) (2000), Rosaceae. Flora of New South Wales Revised Edition 1: 535 [secondary reference]

common name: Blackberry [n/a]

Wheeler, J.R., Marchant, N.G. & Lewington, M. (2002), Dicotyledons. Flora of the South West 2: 863 [secondary reference]

common name: Blackberry [n/a]

Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria (2007), Australian Plant Census: - [misapplied]

misapplied to: Rubus leucostachys Schleich. ex Sm. legitimate by Symon, D.E. in Jessop, J.P. (ed.) (September 1993), Rosaceae. A list of the vascular plants of South Australia Edn. 4: 36

Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria (2007), Australian Plant Census: - [pro parte misapplied]

pro parte misapplied to: Rubus anglocandicans A.Newton legitimate by Harden, G.J. & Rodd, A.N. in Harden, G.J. (ed.) (1990), Rosaceae. Flora of New South Wales 1: 535

[pro parte misapplied]

pro parte misapplied to: Rubus anglocandicans A.Newton legitimate by Jeanes, J.A. & Jobson, P.C. in Walsh, N.G. & Entwisle, T.J. (ed.) (1996), Rosaceae. Flora of Victoria 3: 574-575, Fig. 117n

Evans, K.J., Symon, D.E., Whalen, M.A., Hosking, J.R., Barker, R.M. & Oliver, J.A. (22 June 2007), Systematics of the Rubus fruticosus aggregate (Rosaceae) and other exotic Rubus taxa in Australia. Australian Systematic Botany 20: 232-234, Figs 39, 40 APC [secondary reference]

• APC Comment: The names Rubus ulmifolius (and Rubus ulmifolius 'hybrid') have been widely misapplied in Australia, particularly to R. anglocandicans. Rubus ulmifolius is the only diploid sexually reproducing species of the R. fruticosus agg. in Australia. See K.J.Evans et al., Aust. Syst. Bot. 20: 234 (2007) for further discussion.
• APC Dist.: WA (naturalised), SA (naturalised), NSW (naturalised), Vic (naturalised)

Evans, K.J., Symon, D.E., Whalen, M.A., Hosking, J.R., Barker, R.M. & Oliver, J.A. (22 June 2007), Systematics of the Rubus fruticosus aggregate (Rosaceae) and other exotic Rubus taxa in Australia. Australian Systematic Botany 20: 213 [pro parte misapplied]

pro parte misapplied to: Rubus anglocandicans A.Newton legitimate by Harden, G.J. & Rodd, A.N. in Harden, G.J. (ed.) (1990), Rosaceae. Flora of New South Wales 1: 535

[pro parte misapplied]

pro parte misapplied to: Rubus anglocandicans A.Newton legitimate by Jeanes, J.A. & Jobson, P.C. in Walsh, N.G. & Entwisle, T.J. (ed.) (1996), Rosaceae. Flora of Victoria 3: 574-575, Fig. 117n

Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria (2014), Australian Plant Census: - [pro parte misapplied]

pro parte misapplied to: Rubus anglocandicans A.Newton legitimate by Harden, G.J. & Rodd, A.N. in Harden, G.J. (ed.) (1990), Rosaceae. Flora of New South Wales 1: 535

[pro parte misapplied]

pro parte misapplied to: Rubus anglocandicans A.Newton legitimate by Jeanes, J.A. & Jobson, P.C. in Walsh, N.G. & Entwisle, T.J. (ed.) (1996), Rosaceae. Flora of Victoria 3: 574-575, Fig. 117n

Ferrer-Gallego & Beek, A. van de (26 February 2022), (2861) Proposal to conserve the name Rubus ulmifolius against R. creticus, R. vulgaris, and R. inermis (Rosaceae). Taxon 71(1): 239 [secondary reference]

• Type: " 'In sepibus maritimis Hispania, Schott' (W)."

taxonomic synonym: Rubus inermis Pourr. legitimate

---