Apocynaceae Juss.
Marsdenia araujacea F.Muell.
, legitimate, scientific
[Mueller, F.J.H. von (1868), Fragmenta Phytographiae Australiae 6(45)]:
135
[tax. nov.]
-
Type:
"Ad sinum litoreum Rockingham's Bay. Dallachy."
[Bentham, G. (16 December 1868), Flora Australiensis 4]:
339
[secondary reference]
[Mueller, F.J.H. von (1882), Systematic Census of Australian Plants]:
94
[secondary reference]
[Bailey, F.M. (1913), Comprehensive Catalogue of Queensland Plants]:
326
[secondary reference]
[Hyland, B.P.M., Gray, B. & Elick, R.W. in Cooper, W.E. & Cooper, W.T. (1994), Appendix I: Provisional Species List. Fruits of the Rainforest]:
301
[secondary reference]
[Forster, P.I. (25 October 1995), Circumscription of Marsdenia (Asclepiadaceae: Marsdenieae), with a revision of the genus in Australia and Papuasia. Australian Systematic Botany 8(5)]:
732, fig. 82 (map)
[secondary reference]
-
Type:
"Queensland, Cook District: Stone River, J. Dallachy s.n., 24 Oct. 1866 (holo: MEL (113385, 113386); iso: BRI (AQ333092))."
taxonomic synonym:
Vincetoxicum pachylepis F.M.Bailey
legitimate
[Forster, P.I. in Orchard, A.E. (ed.) (1996), Asclepiadaceae. Flora of Australia 28]:
258, Map 301
[secondary reference]
taxonomic synonym:
Vincetoxicum pachylepis F.M.Bailey
legitimate
taxonomic synonym:
Cynanchum pachylepis (F.M.Bailey) Domin
legitimate
-
APC Dist.:
Qld (presumed extinct)
[Threatened Species and Communities Section, Biodiversity Group, Environment Australia (8 July 1998), Endangered Species Protection Act 1992. Schedules 1, 2 & 3]:
29
[secondary reference]
[Forster, P.I. (23 August 2019), Rediscovery of the previously Extinct Marsdenia araujacea F.Muell. (Apocynaceae). Austrobaileya 10(3)]:
539, Fig. 1
[secondary reference]
taxonomic synonym:
Vincetoxicum pachylepis F.M.Bailey
legitimate
[Forster, P.I. (24 March 2021), Gymnema R.Br. and Leichhardtia R.Br. (Apocynaceae), reinstated genera for taxa previously included in Marsdenia R.Br.: a conspectus for Australia, New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Austrobaileya 11]:
6
[secondary reference]
-
Lectotype:
"Australia. Queensland. COOK DISTRICT: Rockinghams Bay [Stone River], [24 October 1866], [J. Dallachy s.n.] (lecto [here designated]: K 000872971 i.d.v.; isolecto: BRI [AQ333092: with ‘Stone River J. Dallachy 26.10.1866; ex herb. Melbourne’], MEL 113385 [with ‘Stone River 24 October 1866’], MEL 113386 [with species description by Mueller], MEL 113387 [with ‘Rockingham’s Bay’])."
-
Text:
"Mueller (1868) stated that his species was based on material from ‘Rockingham’s Bay. Dallachy’. This collection appears to have been fragmented and mounted as five separate accessions at MEL, BRI and K. The best of the MEL specimens (MEL 113385 with some flowers attached to a leafy stem; labelled as the holotype and with cross referencing to MEL 113386 and MEL 113387) has the location as ‘Stone River’ and a date of 24 October 1866, both written in Dallachy’s hand. MEL 113386 (labelled as an isotype) has a description by Mueller, but no locality, date or collector indicated. MEL 113387 (labelled as possibly an isotype) consisting of three separate leaves and a bit of stem has no description by Mueller, the locality ‘Rockingham’s Bay’, no date and no collector indicated. The material on these three sheets would have originally been unmounted and in folders all kept together at MEL. The sheet at BRI [AQ333092] has a label hand-written by S.T. Blake and states ‘Stone River J. Dallachy 26.10.1866; ex herb. Melbourne’; it comprises
two loose leaves and a bit of stem. The sheet at Kew (K 000872971) is an excellent specimen, bearing a Botanical Museum of Melbourne label with ‘Rockinghams Bay’ in Mueller’s hand, but no collector and no date. It is annotated as being received by Bentham in 1868 and is the material he cited (Bentham 1868: 339); perhaps it was meant to be returned to MEL, but this never occurred.
Because the five specimens are separately accessioned, with different data and no clear cross referencing between them (apart from the three MEL specimens and this cross
referencing would only have been done when the material was mounted), it is necessary to select a lectotype for this name. The specimen at K is easily the best of these, despite the lack of indication of a collector or collection date (although it does say ‘Rec. 1868’). The other four sheets are regarded as isolectotypes."
[Forster, P.I. (24 March 2021), Gymnema R.Br. and Leichhardtia R.Br. (Apocynaceae), reinstated genera for taxa previously included in Marsdenia R.Br.: a conspectus for Australia, New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Austrobaileya 11]:
6
[basionym]
basionym of:
Leichhardtia araujacea (F.Muell.) P.I.Forst.
legitimate
[Brown, G.K. (December 2021), Appendix A: New names and name and status changes 2020 to 2021. Introduction to the Census of the Queensland Flora 2021]:
6
[nomenclatural synonym]
nomenclatural synonym of:
Leichhardtia araujacea (F.Muell.) P.I.Forst.
legitimate