Hemerocallidaceae R.Br.
Luzuriaga Ruiz & Pav. , nom. cons., scientific
Ruiz Lopez, H. & Pavon, J.A. (1802), Flora Peruvianae, et Chilensis 3: 65 [tax. nov.]
  • Type: Luzuriaga radicans Ruíz Lopez & Pavón
  • Comment: nom. cons. (ref. I.C.B.N. (1988) No. 1146).
Brown, R. (27 March 1810), Prodromus florae Novae Hollandiae et insulae Van-Diemen, exhibens characteres plantarum quas annis 1802-1805: 281-282 BHL [secondary reference]
  • Text: "Forsan a plantá peruvianá genere diversa?"
  • Comment: Brown's note that Australian plants may represent a distinct genus has been interpreted by some subsequent authors as publication of a later homonym, but since Brown cites Ruiz & Pavon, Fl. Peruv. 3: 65 (1802), this is here treated as a secondary reference to their name.
Salisbury, R.A. (1866), The Genera of Plants: 67 [taxonomic synonym]
taxonomic synonym of: Calcoa Salisb. nom. illeg., nom. superfl.
Mueller, F.J.H. von (1882), Systematic Census of Australian Plants: 117 [pro parte taxonomic synonym]
pro parte taxonomic synonym of: Geitonoplesium A.Cunn. ex R.Br. legitimate
Mueller, F.J.H. von (December 1889), Second Systematic Census of Australian Plants: 197 [pro parte taxonomic synonym]
pro parte taxonomic synonym of: Geitonoplesium A.Cunn. ex R.Br. legitimate
Farr, E.R., Leussink, J.A. & Stafleu, F.A. in Farr, E.R., Leussink, J.A. & Stafleu, F.A. (ed.) (1979), Index Nominum Genericorum 1: 611 [secondary reference]
taxonomic synonym: Enargea Gaertn. nom. rej.
Laferrière, J.E. (5 October 1995), Nomenclature and type specimens in Eustrephus R.Br. and Geitonoplesium Hook. (Geitonoplesiaceae). Austrobaileya 4(3): 396 [misapplied]
misapplied to: Geitonoplesium A.Cunn. ex R.Br. legitimate by Brown, R. (27 March 1810), Prodromus florae Novae Hollandiae et insulae Van-Diemen, exhibens characteres plantarum quas annis 1802-1805: 281-282
Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria (2006), Australian Plant Census: - [secondary reference]
orthographic variant: Luzuriago F.Muell. orth. var.
Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria (2006), Australian Plant Census: - [misapplied]
misapplied to: Geitonoplesium A.Cunn. ex R.Br. legitimate by Brown, R. (27 March 1810), Prodromus florae Novae Hollandiae et insulae Van-Diemen, exhibens characteres plantarum quas annis 1802-1805: 281-282
Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria (31 July 2018), Australian Plant Census: - [misapplied]
misapplied to: Geitonoplesium A.Cunn. ex R.Br. legitimate by Brown, R. (27 March 1810), Prodromus florae Novae Hollandiae et insulae Van-Diemen, exhibens characteres plantarum quas annis 1802-1805: 281-282